As you are probably aware, Friday, February 21, 1997, the NBC DATELINE Show broadcast a story on D.A.R.E. While not totally positive, the segment clearly demonstrated D.A.R.E.'s immense broad-based popularity and acceptance across the nation.
The story featured positive images of D.A.R.E. including interviews with students who were excited by and were learning from the program. There was video of President Clinton praising the D.A.R.E. program and the D.A.R.E. officers. The show ran an interview with the nation's drug czar General Barry McCaffrey who strongly defended the D.A.R.E. program and its effectiveness. McCaffrey told the viewing audience that, "D.A.R.E. is a tremendous source for good!".
As with most media stories, the DATELINE piece included its fair share of criticism of the D.A.R.E. program, interviewing the Seattle Chief of Police and Malthea Falco from the Drug Strategies Institute and a few others. Here are some facts that may be helpful to you in responding to any inquires:
More then 30 independent studies have substantiated the effectiveness of D.A.R.E. as a drug and violence prevention program. DATELINE discounted the Ohio State University study by claiming that two researchers said it was meaningless. However, they neglected to disclose the names of the two researchers or how they arrived at this conclusion. The Ohio study is the only current research that examined the most updated D.A.R.E. curriculum. Although DATELINE regarded the resulting data as modest, in fact, the results were definitive, with 73 percent of the D.A.R.E. students falling into the low-risk group as compared to 58 percent of non-D.A.R.E. subjects.
As the show pointed out, research on D.A.R.E. indicates positive short-term effects. Based on this effectiveness at the elementary level and the research consensus for reinforcement, we are promoting the expansion of D.A.R.E. into middle and high schools. As President Levant explained on the show, one year of D.A.R.E. or any other prevention program does not provide a lifetime inoculation against drug use. The eradication of drug abuse must include a number of different elements including interdiction, treatment and school-based drug prevention.
Seattle Chief of Police:
The Seattle Chief stated he dropped that he dropped the D.A.R.E. program even though
D.A.R.E. had accomplished much in the community. Seattle D.A.R.E. was not widely
disseminated, they had only 4 to 5 part-time officers. In addition, the Chief claimed that
"cops are not teachers." It should be noted that most every study on D.A.R.E.
indicates that one of the key elements that separate D.A.R.E. from other programs is the
high quality teaching and delivery of D.A.R.E. by the unformed officers.
The Chief claimed that "a lot of other Chiefs" have questioned the program. As all of you know, D.A.R.E. is being taught in 10,000 communities at this time and receives almost unanimous acclaim from police chiefs and sheriffs. None of these many law enforcement D.A.R.E. supporters were interviewed to balance the story. There is no evidence to support his assertion that large numbers of police chiefs around the country would like to drop D.A.R.E.. To the contrary, only a small number of communities discontinue D.A.R.E. each year (generally due to budget constraints), while between 250 and 300 cities add the program annually. In fact last year, 250 cities including New York and Washington, D.C implementing the program.
Malthea Falco:
As the director of the non-governmental Drug Strategies agency she recently produced a
review of School Drug Prevention Programs. In the report, D.A.R.E. was graded highly in
the following areas that are considered by research studies as key elements to successful
prevention teaching:
In conclusion, implementation of D.A.R.E.'s K-12 curriculum, as part of an overall comprehensive effort, is consistent with the latest research on the best approach to reduce drugs and violence among America's youth. The D.A.R.E. Scientific Advisory Board recently responded to concerns about the D.A.R.E. program by releasing a document which states in part, "D.A.R.E. has been clearly shown to make a difference. The D.A.R.E. curriculum improves skills that help students resist risk-taking behaviors and peer influences that might lead to drug use."
The D.A.R.E. Scientific Advisory Board
RESPONDS TO FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
Background
D.A.R.E. is the acronym for Drug Abuse Resistance Education, the single most widely-used substance abuse prevention and safety promotion curriculum in the world. First developed in 1983, D.A.R.E. has undergone multiple revisions as research findings increased knowledge of effective substance abuse prevention among school-aged youth. There are several components to the D.A.R.E. curriculum including the "core curriculum" for fifth or sixth grade; visitation for kindergarten - fourth grade; a middle school/junior high program; a senior high cirriculum; and a parenting component. More than 70 percent of America's school districts have adopted the program, and over 8,000 cooperative partnerships between law enforcement and education are in place across the country. By virtue of D.A.R.E.'s extensive use and national impact, D.A.R.E. has achieved immense name recognition in association with substance abuse prevention, making the D.A.R.E. officer the most recognizable symbol for community policing and prevention.
Independent studies show that D.A.R.E. promotes positive behaviors, with positive effects retained for at least one year after the most recent exposure to D.A.R.E. material. Even the most critical evaluations indicate that D.A.R.E. has a measurable impact on adolescent alcohol use and abuse. While there has been debate in some quarters about D.A.R.E.'s effectiveness, D.A.R.E. has been clearly shown to make a difference. Evaluations show significant differences between students receiving D.A.R.E. and those who do not, in terms of their drug use and gang involvement. The D.A.R.E. curriculum consistently has been shown to improve skills that help students resist risk-taking behaviors and peer influences that might lead to drug use.
Drug abuse is not the only behavior addressed by the D.A.R.E. curriculum because D.A.R.E. recognized how intertwined violence prevention and safety promotion are with drug abuse. Therefore, to ensure an appropriate comprehensive approach, D.A.R.E. promotes healthy self-assertion, positive choices about risk-taking and health-related behaviors, and positive social skills. D.A.R.E.'s curriculum also teaches resistance to gang membership, violence, and destructive peer pressure, as well as substance abuse.
Virtually all substance abuse and violence prevention programs agree that a key to success is enlisting the involvement of community leaders to reinforce a consistent message. D.A.R.E. provides unique involvement for a wide range of these figures, including law enforcement officers, classroom teachers, peer leaders, and parents. Law enforcement professionals especially favor D.A.R.E. because it provides an excellent opportunity for positive interaction with children in a familiar, comfortable classroom setting.
No single curriculum or prevention effort can ensure a drug or violence-free community. Implementation of D.A.R.E.'s K-12 curriculum, as part of an overall comprehensive effort, is consistent with what works best to reduce drugs and violence among America's youth. Appropriate community law enforcement methods, strong parental commitment to prevention, recreational child welfare programs, and additional public health and education efforts are all needed to address the numerous factors which affect drug use among youth.
D.A.R.E. is based on the "social influence theory." Utilizing this scientific theory, D.A.R.E. as described in an independent analysis by Baker, Petty, and Gleicher (1991) (pp. 198-199) "...incorporates the notion that there are many more attitudes relevant to the prevention of drug use than merely one's knowledge and attitude about the illicit drug itself. Attention is given to the bolstering of self-esteem and assertiveness, the role of peers in the influence of drug use, and so on...another variable that influences the stability of newly formed drug attitudes is the amount of practice the person has thinking about and defending this new position from attack...one's attitudes, especially concerning the rejection of drug use, will likely be subject to counterpersuasion by peers or others... Again, Project D.A.R.E. includes a variety of inoculation type sessions in which students practice rejecting persuasive attempts by peers".
The D.A.R.E. Advisory Board
Dr. Herbert Kleber, Chairman
Dr. Mark Gold
Dr. William Harvey
Elizabeth (B.J.) McConnell
Dr. Robert Millman
Dr. David Musto
Sue Rusche
Dr. John Schowalter
Dr. J. Thomas Ungerleider
Dr. Kathleen Wulf
copyright:
D.A.R.E. America
February 28,1997